Okay, some things do not make us look good in the world. But even some unscrupulous survey systems. ITALIAN much more dangerous for us. We have become voyeurs of the jealous and crafty. You can not escape the trial ferocious than those easily offended by applying two or more weights to a number of measures that are too variable. This system (which is called Machiavellian incorrectly) that "the end justifies any means" is more acceptable. It never was. And for what purpose? I remember saying that maybe wrong in a democracy power is exercised by the sovereign people who exercise and expressed through the ballot box? Who does more damage? Who makes things ridiculous and inadequate or who told the world in its own way and without the slightest respect for that colossal belina we call "privacy"?
There are precise rules to respect. For everyone. Daddies viagratici and unscrupulous judges, journalists, commentators from that bar. Written rules and codified.
We say so tired of media voyeurism and we do not know about that. Last night I talked a bit with yet another moral ours. I reaffirmed, sadly for me, that "the end justifies the means." Boh ... I want to see if you feel that way if he were himself to be legal and humanly unacceptable to his injury. In the name of Italy ... of course ... in the name of "morality" ..
We all have someone to whom we are fiercely balls. That he has reason or not, and what is the reason why we hate, that someone would be authorized to use every system, every means against us ? I think not.
But Berlusconi will pass through without being so ever, now saying that we should stop and consider what we are doing.
Do we have to find a limit to everything '. Who .. who ... I wonder ... There is disgraced abroad? About things in bad taste (at least in poor taste because it's of course) makes you (would) or any person who ye say to the world on the internet and the media? Perhaps did not wash your dirty linen in the house? We were not the home of trustees, who until the final sentence pronounced assumed innocence of anyone? Where did it go our strong and unassailable practical sense? In a country used to wash, as it was once (Now you would say to the coin laundry maids) are now reduced to deal with things of absolutely no political significance.
And as for the reviews "moral" ... excuse me ... if riflettissimo on what should be the basis of morality, ie "behave" are we doing it? I think not. Can you imagine the confessor, as soon as we see kneeling next, we ask: "What political idea six son? Let's listen to absolve your sins and sinning if you bring water to my mill or not ..."
I can not stand hypocrisy. And to me the affairs of others are arcistufo. And he says that one to bring home the bread is constrained by many years to deal with their affairs of others.
There are precise rules to respect. For everyone. Daddies viagratici and unscrupulous judges, journalists, commentators from that bar. Written rules and codified.
We say so tired of media voyeurism and we do not know about that. Last night I talked a bit with yet another moral ours. I reaffirmed, sadly for me, that "the end justifies the means." Boh ... I want to see if you feel that way if he were himself to be legal and humanly unacceptable to his injury. In the name of Italy ... of course ... in the name of "morality" ..
We all have someone to whom we are fiercely balls. That he has reason or not, and what is the reason why we hate, that someone would be authorized to use every system, every means against us ? I think not.
But Berlusconi will pass through without being so ever, now saying that we should stop and consider what we are doing.
Do we have to find a limit to everything '. Who .. who ... I wonder ... There is disgraced abroad? About things in bad taste (at least in poor taste because it's of course) makes you (would) or any person who ye say to the world on the internet and the media? Perhaps did not wash your dirty linen in the house? We were not the home of trustees, who until the final sentence pronounced assumed innocence of anyone? Where did it go our strong and unassailable practical sense? In a country used to wash, as it was once (Now you would say to the coin laundry maids) are now reduced to deal with things of absolutely no political significance.
And as for the reviews "moral" ... excuse me ... if riflettissimo on what should be the basis of morality, ie "behave" are we doing it? I think not. Can you imagine the confessor, as soon as we see kneeling next, we ask: "What political idea six son? Let's listen to absolve your sins and sinning if you bring water to my mill or not ..."
I can not stand hypocrisy. And to me the affairs of others are arcistufo. And he says that one to bring home the bread is constrained by many years to deal with their affairs of others.
The author is not responsible for comments included in the post. Any comments from readers, damaging the image or repute of third persons, are not attributable to the author, even if the comment is expressed in an anonymous or encrypted. This blog is not a journal because it is updated without any periodicity. Can not? therefore be regarded as an editorial product under Law No. 62/2001. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment